[java-dev] How efficient is coding objects using Java?
topher lafata
topher at topher.com
Wed Oct 24 11:23:43 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: How efficient is coding objects using Java?
- Next message: [java-dev] Re: experience with stockwatch anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
also... Using the benchmark message allows you to quantify any optimizations that you might be making and could be helpful if you are not aware of it. See the mxj~ examples for use of the benchmark message. T On Oct 24, 2007, at 07:54 AM, Adam Stark wrote: > > Hi, > > I have just written an MSP pitch detector object in java. It works > perfectly but has a very high load on the CPU. In fact, if I use a > signal vector size of more than 256 it causes clicking artefacts in > the audio. The code isn't really that big and I am using a brand > new intel mac book 2.2 GHz machine. > > Is this because of some speed limitation of using mxj quickie to > build java objects? How could I improve the speed? > > I am normally a C programmer and have coded much much larger things > that run in real-time as VST plug-ins for example - and they > generally are not that much of a burden on the CPU. I know Java is > slower than C but I didn't expect it to be quite so limiting, is > there something I am doing wrong? > > Alternatively, if anyone could point me to a good introduction to > programming Max/MSP objects in C I would be very grateful > (apologies as this question prob should go in the other forum but > the first question should be here...). > > I'd be very happy if someone could point me in the right direction, > > Many thanks, > > Adam > _______________________________________________ > java-dev mailing list > java-dev at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: How efficient is coding objects using Java?
- Next message: [java-dev] Re: experience with stockwatch anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
