[java-dev] Re: Re: MXJ getting wrong inlet

Oh, nice - that's good to know! Could simplify some things in the future. Thanks for that.

cheers,

J.

Quote: topher lafata wrote on Fri, 11 April 2008 00:41
----------------------------------------------------
> As an aside. You could do pretty much any sort of complex message to 
> function invocation mapping you wanted to if you just override the 
> anything(String message,Atom[] args) and handle all the messages 
> yourself. I guess in this scenario all your internal methods would 
> potentially be protected/private instead of public to avoid any confusion.
> T
> 
----------------------------------------------------