[java-dev] Re: perils of referencing
Ritchie Argue
maxmspjit at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 16:27:11 MST 2008
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: perils of referencing
- Next message: [java-dev] Re: Re: perils of referencing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
You should grab Effective Java book that Oliver mentioned. It has some good tips in this area, including defensive copying. Its a good habit to let the callee do the copying, as you can't always control who the caller is (for example if you're writing a library that provides your Things to third party clients, they may accidentally do something malicious to it (as you have perhaps discovered)). Worry about efficiency when it becomes a problem, make sure it's correct first =) r. On 7-Feb-08, at 1342, jbmaxwell wrote: > > Oh yeah, jeepers... You're right. A deep copy would copy all the > Things in the ArrayList, as well, wouldn't it! I just want a copy of > the ArrayList itself. Good point. > > I don't know if I'll change my accessor method, but I get the idea. > > Is it possible to do something like: > > ArrayList theseThings = bigThing.getThings().clone(); > > That would leave my accessor method getThings() untouched, and a bit > more efficient for most situations. > > J. > > -------------- > > Thanks Ollie. > > It does make sense to me, actually, but I like to get confirmation > on things before I commit them to the "learned" pile... Passing > references around is generally really handy, so I suppose it's not > fair of me to complain about it now! ;-) > > cheers. > > > _______________________________________________ > java-dev mailing list > java-dev at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: perils of referencing
- Next message: [java-dev] Re: Re: perils of referencing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
