[java-dev] Re: Re: Crash Report: call outlet() with an invalid outlet index
topher lafata
topher at topher.com
Fri Feb 15 00:08:49 MST 2008
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: Re: Crash Report: call outlet() with an invalid outlet index
- Next message: [java-dev] Announce: Groovy programming/scripting language for MaxMSP (beta)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
yes. perhaps the original decision to optimize for this sort of thing was premature given how things actually ended up playing out with the JNI context switch. sorry you suffered as a result adam. t On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Adam Murray wrote: > > Quote: jkc wrote on Thu, 14 February 2008 10:02 > ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> The cost of a size comparison and branching should be close to zero >> as compared to the Java->Context switcth, so I think that this is >> worth fixing (Max 5). > > I was wondering about that when Topher brought up the issue of > overhead. Great to hear! > > > -- > Adam Murray > compusition.com > _______________________________________________ > java-dev mailing list > java-dev at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/java-dev
- Previous message: [java-dev] Re: Re: Crash Report: call outlet() with an invalid outlet index
- Next message: [java-dev] Announce: Groovy programming/scripting language for MaxMSP (beta)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
