[javascript-dev] Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
Joshua Kit Clayton
jkc at musork.com
Thu Oct 4 13:22:28 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Zola wrote: > > I am so sick of seeing you reply to every single person about > disabling antialiasing for "2 to 4x" speed benefit. > It's as if it somehow allows you to slink away from the issue. > EVERY TIME. Sorry, but some people don't read the archives, and/or forget this fact. The reason that JSUI is slow is that it uses a software based OpenGL renderer, and uses 4x multi-sampling if fsaa is enabled (which it is by default). Switching to lua with this same means of rendering will not make much performance difference as the bottleneck is in the drawing. In this case it's not a language perf issue. If you want to make things faster, use js+jit.gl.sketch, or jit.gl.lua with jit.pwindow, which is HW accelerated. As for Lua vs. JS VM performance comparisons. Of course you're right. There are a number of reasons why JS was chosen, and why we're committed to it as a supported scripting language in Max. With Tamarin, the VM performance discrepancy between Lua and JS will not be such an issue. I appreciate your frustration, but there is nothing preventing you or other people from integrating Lua into Max. In fact two people, have already have done this. There's no need to be impolite. Thanks, Joshua
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
