[javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
Zola
looseonthestreet at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 13:50:19 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joshua, Yes, making a lua extern takes just a few hours of work with luabind. I've done so. But the key issue here is something else. Sketch is great. jit.gl.sketch + jit.gl.pwindow works well in the mostly-monolithic scenario. While I have no issues pushing towards eight sketches, it doesn't work out for atomic. With Sketch, I would not create a whole set of building block UI components to use everywhere and love. I use Sketch for centerpiece UI's. Not for lego-bricks. Atomicity is what JSUI is supposed to be able to do. And that's where it fails too. It's too slow for that. So really, there is no use-case for JSUI: We don't want it for atomic, (watch everything freeze up completely.)(hear your music die) And we don't want it for what Sketch does. I am driving at a stronger point here. A powerful, fast, take-it-for-granted-that-it-just-works-fundamental-essential-building-block-of-the-whole-entire-MAX-idea, A way of building UI components to go inside of Max, Perfectly. As a core-feature of Max, is so important. It's the basics, man. It baffles me how Cycling has placed such little importance on getting this right, and allows JSUI to remain a failure. The need is so obvious. - Invect
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
