[javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
Wesley Smith
wesley.hoke at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 13:58:33 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Zola full of lightning? On 10/4/07, Zola <looseonthestreet at gmail.com> wrote: > > Joshua, > > Yes, making a lua extern takes just a few hours of work with luabind. I've done so. But the key issue here is something else. > > Sketch is great. jit.gl.sketch + jit.gl.pwindow works well in the mostly-monolithic scenario. While I have no issues pushing towards eight sketches, it doesn't work out for atomic. > > With Sketch, I would not create a whole set of building block UI components to use everywhere and love. I use Sketch for centerpiece UI's. Not for lego-bricks. > > Atomicity is what JSUI is supposed to be able to do. > And that's where it fails too. > It's too slow for that. > > So really, there is no use-case for JSUI: > We don't want it for atomic, (watch everything freeze up completely.)(hear your music die) > And we don't want it for what Sketch does. > > I am driving at a stronger point here. > A powerful, fast, take-it-for-granted-that-it-just-works-fundamental-essential-building-block-of-the-whole-entire-MAX-idea, > A way of building UI components to go inside of Max, > Perfectly. As a core-feature of Max, > is so important. > It's the basics, man. > It baffles me how Cycling has placed such little importance on getting this right, > and allows JSUI to remain a failure. > The need is so obvious. > > - Invect > _______________________________________________ > javascript-dev mailing list > javascript-dev at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/javascript-dev >
- Previous message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Next message: [javascript-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: jsui was a mistake.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
