[jitter] Re: Quicktime Playback Optimization - some example patches
evan.raskob [lists]
lists at lowfrequency.org
Sun Dec 2 11:00:34 MST 2007
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: Motion Detection and quicktime
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: Quicktime Playback Optimization - some example patches
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Huh. I didn't know that the jit.qt.movie objects had that built-in. BUT - I swear that using a qmetro instead of a metro in the CPU patches makes them more stable. Maybe I am smoking the crack today. -evan On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:55 AM, Jean-François Charles wrote: >> Nice, >> Just a question: Why is it that you use a 'metro' for CPU patches and >> a 'qmetro' for the GPU ones. >> Thanks >> >> JS > > You could use a qmetro in the CPU patches, that would be the same > result, > since jitter matrices objects embed the qmetro functionality. > When it comes to GPU, you have to use qmetro, because the gl > objects do not > embed the q... I think I remember it is said in the first tutorials > on ogl. > Jean-François. > -- > http://www.jeanfrancoischarles.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > jitter mailing list > jitter at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: Motion Detection and quicktime
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: Quicktime Playback Optimization - some example patches
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
