[jitter] Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
vade
doktorp at mac.com
Sun Jul 1 11:01:36 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: smoothing changing values - inertia - slide - acceleration
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would most definitely not use jitter in a broadcast environment. You can guarantee a stable 30 fps *video signal* output from something like a Kona card which jitter can output, but that doesnt guarantee that the content will look like it has a stable 30 fps. Yeah, I would shy away from that very fast. On Jun 30, 2007, at 10:33 PM, robert vanrhyn wrote: > > This is a simple question. > > Can jitter be relied upon to provide stable playback at 30 fps > with more than 1 jit-object at 720x486? > > If I have just 1 jit.qt.movie object all playsback fine but > I now extract an alpha with let's say jit.unpack or jit.coerce, > etc, I can surely expect inconsistent playback, despite any > system specs (mine are beefy pc w/intel quad core). > > Playback is ok most of the time, but "most of the time" isn't > good enough for broadcast work. > > Is there a consensus on this? > > > help!!! > > > _______________________________________________ > jitter mailing list > jitter at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter v a d e // www.vade.info abstrakt.vade.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.cycling74.com/pipermail/jitter/attachments/20070701/5622fca3/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: smoothing changing values - inertia - slide - acceleration
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
