[jitter] Re: Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
vade
doktorp at mac.com
Sun Jul 1 18:05:25 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or ProfessionalGrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
you're going to have inherit issues with compositing in openGL and then reading back to main memory to output to the MXO or other type of professional playback device, since they dont have accelerated 3d chipsets. Ill agree with whats below. If you have fast enough disks, try working with uncompressed quicktime movies, you'll get less CPU usage for qt decompression which is currently not threaded, as far as my understanding is concerned. On Jul 1, 2007, at 7:47 PM, marcus lyall wrote: > > Stable playback= commercially viable = prepared to pay more money > for product! > v a d e // www.vade.info abstrakt.vade.info -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.cycling74.com/pipermail/jitter/attachments/20070701/f2dd81d1/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or Professional Grade?
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: Re: Jitter Video Playback - Amatuer or ProfessionalGrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
