[jitter] jit.uldl bogus ?
Jeremy Bernstein
jeremy at bootsquad.com
Sun Nov 11 07:04:20 MST 2007
- Previous message: [jitter] jit.uldl bogus ?
- Next message: [jitter] jit.uldl bogus ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is not suprising. I think I've mentioned for some time that jit.uldl needs a rewrite for its old, old, old long deprecated (and now apparently stripped from the OS) code. I'll see what can be done, but please don't expect anything before the release of Max 5. jb Am 07.11.2007 um 14:45 schrieb joshua goldberg: > confirmed. no messages in the error window. this appears to be > the first leopard max casualty.
- Previous message: [jitter] jit.uldl bogus ?
- Next message: [jitter] jit.uldl bogus ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
