[jitter] loading more than 2GB of matrixes?
Joshua Kit Clayton
jkc at musork.com
Tue Sep 4 14:40:49 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [jitter] loading more than 2GB of matrixes?
- Next message: [jitter] Re: loading more than 2GB of matrixes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 4, 2007, at 1:19 PM, evan.raskob [lists] wrote: >> If you are trying a *loadram* message to jit.qt.movie it will also >> not load the RAM, if not crash. When you just open a file via >> read, it is not loaded into RAM. Perhaps this is the discrepancy >> you are seeing. > > Using Activity monitor, I load a ~5GB Quicktime file and don't see > a huge increase in RAM. After next sending it a "loadram" message > I see RAM usage jump to ~16GB (on a 16GB RAM, Quad-processor Intel > Mac), and movie plays very well. Unless there is something odd > with Activity Monitor, or that I missing something important, > doesn't this mean that entire 5GB of the movie is now in RAM? Perhaps QT now has some ability to load into the RAM of another process, or on the fly RAM disk, or some other trickiness that I was unaware of. You might also be able to use a RAM disk to your advantage for read/writing matrices faster than to/from disk. -Joshua
- Previous message: [jitter] loading more than 2GB of matrixes?
- Next message: [jitter] Re: loading more than 2GB of matrixes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
