[jitter] compare tracking performance of softVNS with jitter
Renaud RUBIANO
cycling.list at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 00:58:59 MST 2008
- Previous message: [jitter] compare tracking performance of softVNS with jitter
- Next message: [jitter] Re: compare tracking performance of softVNS with jitter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
if you hav a mac intel computer, it will be jitter 'cause softVns isn't universal binary at this time. best reno- Le 25 févr. 08 à 02:36, Terry McDermott a écrit : > > I'd like to do video tracking using 2 cameras, tracking the movement > of one or more people in a laneway. Each camera covers one half of > the length of the laneway (one at each end), from overhead. Which > package would be better for this application, jitter or softvns? any > opinions? > Thanks > terry > _______________________________________________ > jitter mailing list > jitter at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter
- Previous message: [jitter] compare tracking performance of softVNS with jitter
- Next message: [jitter] Re: compare tracking performance of softVNS with jitter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
