[jitter] Re: Better way to make "video freeze" ?
Wesley Smith
wesley.hoke at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 10:12:19 MST 2008
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Better way to make "video freeze" ?
- Next message: [jitter] Rubix Cube Positions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There are many ways to do this depending on how you want the image to fade out. The simplest is to use jit.xfade where the second input contains your frozen frame and you gradually shift back to the main frame. For more interesting transitions, introduce some feedback. I think you just need to start playing with things. wes On Jan 3, 2008 7:06 AM, Cheng Chien-Wen <ondinecomposer2 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I did not find any similar effect in Jitter example folder. > Could you let me know which patch you refer to ? > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > jitter mailing list > jitter at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter >
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Better way to make "video freeze" ?
- Next message: [jitter] Rubix Cube Positions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
