[jitter] Re: cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs and optimization
vade
doktorp at mac.com
Mon Jan 7 13:13:27 MST 2008
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs and optimization
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs and optimization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Might be be the code in the shader as well? I looked at the chromasmoothing portion of the code and noticed yuv_val.zy = mix(yvyu_left.yw,yuv_val.zy,vec2(coord_frak.x>=0.&&chromasmooth>0.5)); might the && operation cause issues on older cards? Im asking, as I simply dont know :) Also, speaking of, how on earth does one reasonably derive supported options based on hardware/driver configurations? Ive attempted to determine this occasionally and frankly it seems harder to find this out than just try different codepaths. On Jan 7, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Joshua Kit Clayton wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Tyler Nitsch wrote: > >> Sorry kind of been preoccupied with other stuff. In reference to >> the errors I was having with the cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs shader on my >> computer. My gpu has had a couple of new drivers made so I thought >> to revisit this issue. Still problems with the cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs >> shader but ya the cc.uyvy2rgba.lite.jxs program works. > > Thanks for the update. Sounds like it might be related to chroma > smoothing assumptions then. You might try sending the message "param > chromasmooth 0". Let us know if that works and we can try to figure > out what the issue might be. > > Thanks, > Joshua_______________________________________________ > jitter mailing list > jitter at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs and optimization
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Re: cc.uyvy2rgba.jxs and optimization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
