[jitter] Breakin up Engine and GUI
Dan Winckler
dan at danwinckler.com
Tue Jan 22 21:10:45 MST 2008
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Breakin up Engine and GUI
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Breakin up Engine and GUI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'll throw in my bit of experience with this sort of thing.... I have used two instances of Max to divvy up my video processing and it worked out quite well. I was using xray.jit.water in one instance, which was quite processor-intensive, so I split that part of the patch off and ran it in one instance. With jit.net.send/recv, I was able to send a 1 char 720 480 matrix between instances at a solid 30fps (on a MBP 2.33GHz, 3GB RAM, Radeon X1600). I did experiment with jit.broadcast and jit.qt.broadcast but I don't recall the results. :-X Note: on Mac it's easy to just duplicate Max/MSP and have two editable (non-runtime) instances going at once -- not sure how it works on XP. From what I gather, OSC is definitely the way to go for sending control data (I haven't done it yet). hth, dan
- Previous message: [jitter] Re: Breakin up Engine and GUI
- Next message: [jitter] Re: Breakin up Engine and GUI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
