i got best resualts with the imaging source DFG 1394<br>see <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/twiki/bin/view/ResourceGuide/VideoDevicesResources">http://www.cycling74.com/twiki/bin/view/ResourceGuide/VideoDevicesResources</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Mattijs Kneppers <<a href="mailto:mattijs@smadsteck.nl">mattijs@smadsteck.nl</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Quote: <a href="mailto:algorithmic@gmx.at">algorithmic@gmx.at</a> wrote on Fri, 04 April 2008 16:30<br>
----------------------------------------------------<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> who knows the very very very best hardware solution to get the lowest video latency possible? i have the newest mac-pro machine...<br>
><br>
> i read everything about uncompressed firewire devices... is there any faster solution, pci or something else?<br>
><br>
> how can i improve the latency in jitter beside the hardware problem? i simply use jit.gt.grab...<br>
><br>
> thanks!<br>
</div>----------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Good question. The lowest I got was by plugging a DV camera directly into the computer with a firewire cable, but that's still about 4 frames delay. When using an ADVC-100 the delay increases to about 8.<br>
<br>
They say an uncompressed firewire camera should do better. Is that true?<br>
<br>
I don't think the latency in Jitter is a problem as long as the low priority thread doesn't take 100% cpu (note: that'll look like 25% per processor on a quad-core machine).<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Mattijs<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
jitter mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:jitter@cycling74.com">jitter@cycling74.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter" target="_blank">http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/jitter</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>