[maxmsp] Re: saving CPU with poly~
Stefan Tiedje
Stefan-Tiedje at addcom.de
Mon Aug 6 23:28:01 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
mzed schrieb: > One idea: when doing a 14 channel piece with much poly~ use, I found > that scripting the patch cords I need (and not the ones I don't) > saved me a lot of overhead. That might not fit your situation. Each time you script audio patch cords, audio will be switched off/on, which will lead to sound interuption/clicks if your patch is big. A very bad idea... > Second idea: I found that manging signal routing with matrix~ was > pretty efficient... probably more so than a number of small gate~'s. This is efficient and well worth to try. In the example code, there are send~ objects. If you don't create feedback, you could replace them with send/receive (no tilde~). Would be a little bit more effective as well... Stefan -- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
