[maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
Dan Nigrin
dan at defectiverecords.com
Tue Aug 7 06:18:03 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yeah, I had this same idea Roman! What I ended up doing though was rethinking my routing, and I got much more efficient using matrix~ as Michael had suggested earlier in the thread. Still, this is a good trick for future use! Dan At 2:03 AM -0600 8/7/07, Roman Thilenius wrote: >hi guys, > >always try the secret 100 method first, which is codenamed >"turning the cable off to turn the connected object off". > >p.s. i havent tried it with send~ yet. -- Dan Nigrin Defective Records 202 Hack / PC-1600 User / VSTi Host / OMS Convert / Jack OS X / Major Malfunction http://www.defectiverecords.com http://www.jackosx.com
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: saving CPU with poly~
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
