[maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
Mattijs Kneppers
mattijs at smadsteck.nl
Fri Jun 1 03:26:37 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Honestly, I don't think it is harmful to anyone to throw an error if there is no set/getvalueof in the js when pattr sends it something.. Error messages are not only for dumb people but also a tool to speed up the work of smart people ;) Mattijs Quote: Jeremy Bernstein wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 11:13 ---------------------------------------------------- > Because the jsui object itself DOES support pattr bindings, and > because pattr is dumb as a rock, the binding functions. If the script > in the jsui were swapped out for a script which did support get/ > setvalueof, everything would work swimmingly. > > I am not in favor of an error message in this case. If you're smart > enough to use javascript, you're smart enough to read the pattr SDK > and troubleshoot the missing get/setvalueofness. ;) > > jb > > Am 01.06.2007 um 10:43 schrieb Mattijs Kneppers: > > > In this case, I too would expect an error message when binding the > > pattr to the jsui (because the jsui doesn't support pattr bindings). > > ---------------------------------------------------- -- SmadSteck - http://www.smadsteck.nl Hard- and software for interactive audiovisual sampling
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
