[maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
Jeremy Bernstein
jeremy at bootsquad.com
Fri Jun 1 03:38:42 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Let me put it another way: it's not going to change. It's too much extra work to support one object which functions in a special way (scripts within objects which may or may not support certain methods). At such time that we have a language-binding API and support this sort of stuff on a general level, I'd be willing to add the extra check, but pattr has enough to do already. jb Am 01.06.2007 um 11:26 schrieb Mattijs Kneppers: > > Honestly, I don't think it is harmful to anyone to throw an error > if there is no set/getvalueof in the js when pattr sends it > something.. > > Error messages are not only for dumb people but also a tool to > speed up the work of smart people ;) > > Mattijs
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
