[maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
Mattijs Kneppers
mattijs at smadsteck.nl
Fri Jun 1 03:43:02 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] PhoneTones
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quote: Jeremy Bernstein wrote on Fri, 01 June 2007 11:38 ---------------------------------------------------- > Let me put it another way: it's not going to change. It's too much > extra work to support one object which functions in a special way > (scripts within objects which may or may not support certain > methods). At such time that we have a language-binding API and > support this sort of stuff on a general level, I'd be willing to add > the extra check, but pattr has enough to do already. Ah, of course. I was just being theoretical there. I agree that the priority isn't very high. Mattijs > > jb > > Am 01.06.2007 um 11:26 schrieb Mattijs Kneppers: > > > > > Honestly, I don't think it is harmful to anyone to throw an error > > if there is no set/getvalueof in the js when pattr sends it > > something.. > > > > Error messages are not only for dumb people but also a tool to > > speed up the work of smart people ;) > > > > Mattijs > ---------------------------------------------------- -- SmadSteck - http://www.smadsteck.nl Hard- and software for interactive audiovisual sampling
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: jsui + pattr = strangeness...
- Next message: [maxmsp] PhoneTones
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
