[maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
Stefan Tiedje
Stefan-Tiedje at addcom.de
Thu Nov 1 01:26:12 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Most accurate method for plotting the amplitude of an audio signal?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter McCulloch schrieb: > A couple of years ago, I saw a presentation from a guy who was doing > surround sound promotions sponsored by Tannoy. IIRC, he claimed there > was a study done showing that it was almost impossible to tell the > difference between material upsampled from 48kHZ to 96kHz and material > recorded at 96 kHz. Curious to hear about your results once you get it > working. Never trust statistics you didn't fake yourself... If I can easily hear the difference, the study was maybe targeted at untrained ipod degraded ears... ;-) Or they used high end converters which I would never be able to afford in my whole lifetime... Stefan -- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Most accurate method for plotting the amplitude of an audio signal?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
