[maxmsp] Re: Any point to using 192Khz for recording?

Anthony Bisset schrieb:
> http://www.smr-home-theatre.org/surround2002/technology/page_08.shtml
> 
These guys live in a different world:

"Data storage is cheap these days; I can get a terabyte for less than
three thousand dollars. We need to deliver audio as painlessly as
possible to the consumer."

I get a terabyte for less than 250 Euros, but they still consider it 
cheap... ;-)

> Many golden ears like the MR-1 but the plots on this page are not 
> exactly exciting.  I'd like to see a DSD conversion down to 96khz 
> compared, perhaps in my next life when i have time for such things.

Another point is if they put up wave forms as arguments they obviously
do not trust their ears...
The cleaner waveforms will be distorted in their ears anyway to what is
supposed to be worse...

Tech talk marketing I'd call that. Its made for people who do not
understand, but have too many bucks to spend...

> it follows recording shouldn't be so dependent on things sounding
> professional rather just "sounding intentional".

You pinpoint it to the essential. Nothing to add...

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com