[maxmsp] Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max

Adam Murray schrieb:
> I think the real problem is the namespace depends on the patch
> structure. These need to be decoupled, or as you said, we need
> "unnamed intermediate subpatchers". One idea that might work well
> with the current pattr system is to introduce a pattrlink object that
> allows for setting up symlinks for use with pattrforward and
> pattrbackward.

I guess the pattrmarker object would allow for unnamed intermediate 
subpatchers, and even if they get named automatically, it wouldn't hurt. 
You could adress your object either by the full path or the pattrmarker 
name path...

You might need some extra patching/scripting to create independent 
pattrmarker names though. But that seems to be a solvable problem...
I can imagine to use a sort of #0_patrmarker_names and a coll which 
would keep track of all the instances...

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com