[maxmsp] Re: Any point to using 192Khz for recording?

to be fair, this page is four years old.

On Nov 1, 2007, at 6:22 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote:

> Anthony Bisset schrieb:
>> http://www.smr-home-theatre.org/surround2002/technology/page_08.shtml
> These guys live in a different world:
>
> "Data storage is cheap these days; I can get a terabyte for less than
> three thousand dollars. We need to deliver audio as painlessly as
> possible to the consumer."
>
> I get a terabyte for less than 250 Euros, but they still consider it  
> cheap... ;-)
>
>> Many golden ears like the MR-1 but the plots on this page are not  
>> exactly exciting.  I'd like to see a DSD conversion down to 96khz  
>> compared, perhaps in my next life when i have time for such things.
>
> Another point is if they put up wave forms as arguments they obviously
> do not trust their ears...
> The cleaner waveforms will be distorted in their ears anyway to what  
> is
> supposed to be worse...
>
> Tech talk marketing I'd call that. Its made for people who do not
> understand, but have too many bucks to spend...
>
>> it follows recording shouldn't be so dependent on things sounding
>> professional rather just "sounding intentional".
>
> You pinpoint it to the essential. Nothing to add...
>
> Stefan
>
> -- 
> Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
> --_____-----------|--------------
> --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()-------
> -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
> ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maxmsp mailing list
> maxmsp at cycling74.com
> http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/maxmsp
>