[maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
vade
doktorp at mac.com
Thu Nov 1 13:35:15 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Next message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, Im not sure how this will really effect your work. The claims were all about functional aesthetics. I really dont see anything in the Max 5 GUI that is will actively interfere with your being able to effectively patch. And, really, these claims are all complete speculation until a) max 5 is out b) you use it - and get used to it. Only then can you compare. If you use Max 5 and have actual issues of not being as productive as you were in max 4, then, id say you have a point (assuming your ability isnt marred by your unwillingness to adapt to Max 5s new paradigms). I can see how people can not like rounded corners, but making the claim it effects your ability to do work, in my opinion is a bit sensationalist. What about Quartz Composer users, I dont see them screaming for square corners, they dont even have the ability to have more than one joint in a patch coord! Or Plogue Bidule users? :) On Nov 1, 2007, at 2:25 PM, f.e wrote: > Glad to read this, Kasp :-) > > f.e > > f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music > >>>>>>> http://www.personal-computer-music.com > >>>>>>> |sublime music for a desperate people| > > > Kasper T Toeplitz a écrit : >>> >>> BUT we're actually a bunch of guys (more than you think) really >>> really not happy at all with these ugly rounded corners. >> i'm with you f.e. >> and you even did not mention the way the new [gain~] (fader) looks >> like!! >> kasper > _______________________________________________ > maxmsp mailing list > maxmsp at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/maxmsp
- Previous message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Next message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
