[maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max
John Pitcairn
cycling74forum at opuslocus.net
Thu Nov 1 15:30:39 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quote: Stefan Tiedje wrote on Fri, 02 November 2007 00:54 ---------------------------------------------------- > You might need some extra patching/scripting to create > independent pattrmarker names though. But that seems to be a > solvable problem... I can imagine to use a sort of > #0_patrmarker_names and a coll which would keep track of all > the instances... I prototyped most of a non-pattr namespace system using coll etc to keep track of names/instances, and found that as things scaled up, the number of supporting objects and coll sizes required became a problem. Load times were getting seriously long, and coll lookup overhead for calls wasn't ideal. A pattr-based system as you describe would certainly fare better, but the supporting object cruft is less than desirable. And you still have the problem that everything is public.
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: Re: How to apply oo within Max
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
