[maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
Trond Lossius
lossius at bek.no
Fri Nov 2 03:58:17 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: why we will not use max 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
With all due respect, I'm a bit surprised at the heated emotions about rounded. To me rounded corners does not make much of a difference. After a few weeks use we will probably never think of it, we1'll be focusing on what we actually do, in the same way as with the transition from OS9 to OSX on the Mac platform. When occasionally booting into OS9 one might regret the waist of pixels in OSX, but on the other hand we have to accept the fact that increase in screen resolution is not only used for physically larger screens, but also for screens with denser pixel distributions while remaining the same size. So stuff demanding more pixels than before has to be expected, making it easier on our eyes, but a bit more heavy on the processor and GPU. But then again, it is easier to upgrade and substitute computers than eyes. The really important and great issue to me about Max5 is that which I will never see: The reworking of underlying code to ensure that further maintenance, ports to ever new platforms and future development can happen. Improved useability, user-frienliness, productivity and not the least documentation are all very welcome, but I would personally be willing to pay for an upgrade just for the foresightedness of this maintenance of the code at the core of the program. That's what ensure that I'll be able to keep working and developing what I'm doing over the next 20 years. Best, Trond f.e wrote: > Yeah yeah. Go forward with your silly jokes, mates. > > BUT we're actually a bunch of guys (more than you think) really really > not happy at all with these ugly rounded corners. > > This is not a joke. We're really pissed off. > > There's no way to compare our reaction to "let's go back to OS9" and > such crap, it's just silly. This is not even a matter of taste. C74 > shouldn't have tried to fix what was already working. > > Fancy antialiasing doesn't NEED to be round, correct me if i'm wrong. > > People who wants to play with ugly softwares got plenty of choices all > around. You want your rounded corners ? You'll have it, so don't mess in > our complains. > > We're seriously asking for an extra option to have RECTANGULAR CORNERS.
- Previous message: [maxmsp] why we will not use max 5
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: why we will not use max 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
