[maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
Trond Lossius
lossius at bek.no
Sat Nov 3 03:33:09 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: iPhone OSC app...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There's a paper in JAES (Journal of the Acoustic Engineering Society) September 2007 that might be of interest: E. Brad Meyer and David R. Moran: "Audibility of a CD-Standard A/D/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback". Qouting the abstract: "Conventional wisdom asserts that the wider bandwidth and dynamic range of SACD and DVD-A make them of audibly higher quality than the CD format. A carefully controlled double-blind test with many experienced listeners showed no ability to hear any differences between formats. High-resolution audio discs were still judged to be of superior quality because sound engineers have more freedom to make them that way. There is no evidence that perceived quality has anything to do with additional resolution or bandwidth." The authors suggest that the reason why SACD and DVD-A recordings are generally perceived to sound better is not the improved quality of the digital format, but rather the difference in approach to the mastering process. These recordings are assumed to be listened to in a hifi setting, and the mastering is thorough, and using proper headroom. In contrast most (popular) recordings are increasingly compressed to death to fit in with the lofi listening situations resulting from modern playback devices being used in noisy environments (cars, iPods, etc.). Best, Trond Stefan Tiedje wrote: > Peter McCulloch schrieb: >> A couple of years ago, I saw a presentation from a guy who was doing >> surround sound promotions sponsored by Tannoy. IIRC, he claimed there >> was a study done showing that it was almost impossible to tell the >> difference between material upsampled from 48kHZ to 96kHz and material >> recorded at 96 kHz. Curious to hear about your results once you get >> it working. > > Never trust statistics you didn't fake yourself... If I can easily hear > the difference, the study was maybe targeted at untrained ipod degraded > ears... ;-) > Or they used high end converters which I would never be able to afford > in my whole lifetime... > > Stefan >
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Samplerates in max
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: iPhone OSC app...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
