[maxmsp] Re: forwarding signals
volker böhm
vboehm at gmx.ch
Wed Oct 3 15:55:31 MDT 2007
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: forwarding signals
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: forwarding signals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03 Oct 2007, at 22:32, julienbreval wrote: > > No, because [send~] / [receive~] adds a delay of one audio block : > eg if you are working at 44100 Hz with a latency of 256 samples, > you get a delay of about 6 msec between the send and the receive of > the audio signal. this is only true if you use send~/receive~ in a feedback loop. otherwise it would render these objects useless. #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 9.; #P user number~ 157 192 215 207 9 3 3 2 0. 0. 0 0. 250 0. 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0; #P user ezdac~ 80 225 124 258 0; #P window linecount 1; #P newex 95 153 40 196617 -~; #P newex 125 121 66 196617 receive~ bla; #P newex 126 84 52 196617 send~ bla; #P newex 95 55 39 196617 noise~; #P connect 0 0 3 0; #P connect 0 0 1 0; #P connect 3 0 4 0; #P connect 3 0 4 1; #P connect 3 0 5 0; #P connect 2 0 3 1; #P window clipboard copycount 6; > But why not using [send] and [receive] as it works also for signals ? because you can't use the set message to change the destination... vb
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Re: forwarding signals
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: forwarding signals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
