[maxmsp] Many data to store: preset or coll?
Stefan Tiedje
Stefan-Tiedje at addcom.de
Tue Apr 1 03:32:57 MDT 2008
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Wonder or wave field synthesis on max?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: [OT] Bootcamp on OS 10.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Delges schrieb: > The [pattr] objects family is the more versatile for presets. But > it's a bit more difficult to use than [coll]... To store 80 GUIs in 100 presets I'd say pattrstorage/autopattr is about 1000*(several magnitudes) simpler than using a coll. I wouldn't know how to do it with coll (I don't want to know), and I have more than 15 years of maxin' in my pocket... ;-) Chris Muir schrieb: > Preset is fragile, in that as you add things, your old data is no > longer valid. I sometimes use preset for very quick and dirty things, > but not for anything that I will want to modify over time. It's fine as long all objects are in the same (main) patch, and if you can live with lost data during developement. The GUI is intuitively simple. But if you need to create your own GUI anyway, just go the pattr way. pattr rocks - no problem to include data from subpatchers and bpatchers and poly~s... Stefan -- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Wonder or wave field synthesis on max?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: [OT] Bootcamp on OS 10.4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
