[maxmsp] Re: Synced Delaytimes?
Pere Josep Villez
pvillez at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 13:14:20 MST 2008
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Synced Delaytimes?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: how to create classic glide/portamento?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I agree wth Andreas in that it seems a tad long winded. Stay clear of division it is unfriendly. 1000 divided by 100 The Reciprocal is: 1000 multiplied by 0.01 (same thing very much faster. On 01/01/2008, Andreas Wetterberg <awetterberg at post.cybercity.dk> wrote: > > > I would definitely steer clear of using timer to do this. It seems (to me) > to be a very roundabout way of getting back a value that you yourself have > set (in phasor~ or sync~). > > Like smill said: > Even more direct would be to simply take the reciprocal of the frequency > of the > master [phasor~] (to get the period) and use this to set the delay > time. You could also, of course, multiply and/or divide this period > to get multiples/divisions of the sync signal. > _______________________________________________ > maxmsp mailing list > maxmsp at cycling74.com > http://www.cycling74.com/mailman/listinfo/maxmsp > -- A Pereshaped definition of a rotten Apple: "You will never know what size worm is in your next apple byte"! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.cycling74.com/pipermail/maxmsp/attachments/20080101/9191d82a/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Synced Delaytimes?
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: how to create classic glide/portamento?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
