[maxmsp] Re: Sampling rate for physical controllers
Andrew Benson
andrewb at cycling74.com
Tue Mar 4 15:58:42 MST 2008
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Sampling rate for physical controllers
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Sampling rate for physical controllers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There isn't really a fixed "standard" when it comes to control latency. If you talk to most musicians, they will want "as little as possible", but you are going to be limited by the speed of whatever hardware communication protocol you use. Pretty much any hardware interface is going to have some amount of latency, but it will vary with the particular implementation. You will have to find your own happy balance between data-rate, processing speed, hardware limitations, and perceptual effectiveness. Most people I talk to find that up to 50ms is musically tolerable, and sometimes more if temporal interpolation is used effectively. I would probably try to keep it below 50ms if possible. Andrew B.
- Previous message: [maxmsp] Re: Sampling rate for physical controllers
- Next message: [maxmsp] Re: Sampling rate for physical controllers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
